DPDP compliance software for consultants and CA firms, compared

Most lists of DPDP software compare platforms a business runs on itself: consent collection at scale, data discovery across its own systems, its own rights requests. A practitioner needs something else: a separate, sealed record for each client, an assessment that can be repeated across clients, and documents and registers produced per client.

01One workspace per client

Each client’s records held apart, so nothing from one engagement reaches another.

02Client limit and price per client

From published prices only, with tax treated the same way for every tool.

03White-label deliverables

Reports and documents that carry the practitioner’s name rather than the vendor’s.

04An assessment mapped to the law

Findings tied to the section of the Act or the rule they rest on.

05Documents

The notice, processor agreements, the record of processing and the policies an engagement produces.

06Registers with the statutory clocks

The ninety-day ceiling for grievances under Rule 14(3) and the seventy-two-hour report to the Board under Rule 7(2)(b).

07Evidence per client

Where consent is the basis, the Data Fiduciary bears the burden of proving notice and consent under Section 6(10).

08How findings are produced

In the vendor’s own published words, and where the data is held.

Monthly price divided by the clients the plan holds, with every slot in use. Tax is treated the same way for every tool: 18% GST is added where the vendor adds it at checkout; Gevox charges no GST.

DPDP Compass and GRCfy Maestro do not publish a price. DPDPOne’s plans also cover the practitioner’s own organisation, and its founding prices end on 30 October 2026. A lower figure is not better on its own: compare what each plan includes.

These run an organisation’s own compliance: consent at scale, its own systems, its own requests. A client may already use one. The practitioner’s workspace holds the engagement; the client’s platform runs the day-to-day operation. Pricing is on each vendor’s site.

• ComplyDP
• Consentin (Leegality)
• ConsentOS
• Digital Anumati
• KavachOne
• miniOrange
• OneTrust
• Privy by IDfy
• ProtectComply
• Redacto
• Securiti
• Seqrite

Some vendors offer practitioners a share of revenue for clients referred to the vendor’s own product. The client then works in the vendor’s platform under the vendor’s name. That is a different arrangement from a workspace in which the practitioner delivers the engagement.

ConsentOS CA Firm Partner Programme

A 20% recurring revenue share on referred clients, who use ConsentOS-branded workspaces. consentos.in/partners

RuleExpert partner programme

Four tiers, no fee; engagements routed to partners; a free tenant for the partner’s own practice. ruleexpert.com/partners

1. 1 to 5 clients

   Independent consultant or virtual DPO

   Compare entry plans by price per client and by whether deliverables can carry your name. For two or three clients, spreadsheets may still be enough.

2. 10 to 40 clients

   Boutique consultancy

   The clocks and the evidence across clients matter most at this size. Look at how each tool runs the rights and breach registers per client, and at white-label.

3. 50 clients and more

   CA firm or company secretarial practice

   Look at pooled client limits, seats for associates, roles, and an audit trail of who did what.

4. Formal audits

   Auditor or assurance provider

   A tool with a defined control set and auditor sign-off, such as GRCfy Maestro, is built for that engagement.

Related: Gevox and spreadsheets, task by task · how a DPDP engagement runs · the DPDP retainer · Gevox vs OneTrust · Gevox vs Securiti · Gevox vs GRC platforms · Gevox pricing

Tools were included if Google, ChatGPT or Perplexity named them on 5 October 2026 for running DPDP work across many clients, or if they are listed on the ICAI AI portal, and their own page could be read. Every fact comes from the source linked beside it, read on 5 October 2026. Statements about the law are summaries; the text of the Act and the DPDP Rules 2025 governs. The page is reviewed monthly; the next review is 5 November 2026. Vendors can send corrections to suryansh@gevox.in; corrections are recorded in the changelog. Prices in Indian rupees; per-client figures rounded to the nearest rupee.