Gevox
DPDP reference

Section 44

Amendments to certain Acts

Amends the TRAI Act, removes section 43A of the IT Act, and substitutes the personal information exemption in the RTI Act.

Read this before you cite anything here

These pages are a plain-English restatement, written to help you find the right provision and understand what it asks of you. They are not the text of the statute, and nothing here should be quoted as though it were. Section and rule numbers are exact, and every page names its source.

What it says

01
The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 is amended to accommodate the Appellate Tribunal’s new jurisdiction.
02
Section 43A of the Information Technology Act, 2000, which carried the earlier compensation regime for failure to protect sensitive personal data, is omitted.
03
Section 8(1)(j) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 is substituted, exempting information relating to personal information from disclosure.

In practice

The omission of IT Act s.43A is the practical change. The old SPDI compensation route is gone, and with it the sensitive-personal-data category that the 2011 rules built. Anyone still classifying data as SPDI is working from a repealed framework.

Read next

The DPDP brief

One email a month. What moved in the Act, and what our scans found.

Section 44 is live. One email a month on what moved in the Act, every claim cited to its section, the same way this page is.

Notice, given under Section 5 and Rule 3

What we collect: your email address, the date you subscribed, the page you subscribed from, and your IP address. Why: to send you the Gevox DPDP brief, roughly monthly. Nothing else. We do not sell or share this list. Withdrawing: every issue carries a one-click unsubscribe that needs no login and asks no questions. Your rights: you can ask for a copy of this data, have it corrected, or have it erased, and you can complain to our Grievance Officer at grievance@gevox.in or to the Data Protection Board of India.

Notice version 2026-09-07.1. We store this text as it appears here, against your consent, so both are provable later.Privacy policy